
Political tensions continued to mount in Hong Kong on Thursday as
lawmakers threw objects at chief executive C.Y. Leung amid growing calls
for his resignation, while commentaries in China's state media struck
an ominous note following Tuesday's mass pro-democracy march.
Leung
was pelted with various items, including a glass of water that smashed
near him, as he attended a meeting with representatives from the city's
Legislative Council (LegCo), while others held up banners demanding full
democracy in the former British colony.
Leung, who has refused
to step down, told lawmakers that proposals for public nominations of
candidates in the 2017 race for chief executive were unlikely to win
support from Beijing, which recently reasserted its ultimate control
over Hong Kong in a June 10 white paper.
More than 20
pro-democracy lawmakers held up banners in the LegCo chamber calling for
universal suffrage, shouting slogans as Leung left, and the speaker
called a recess.
Leung said legislators, who confronted him after
hundreds of thousands took to the city's streets on Tuesday to call for
public nomination of election candidates, were using "abusive language"
and taking "increasingly radical actions"
"We can see that some
LegCo members ... threw objects, including a glass which smashed, right
under the gaze of the public," Leung told lawmakers after the incident,
although a number of pro-democracy lawmakers had already walked out in
protest.
"I think everyone, including LegCo, should be concerned about this developing trend," he said.
'Absolute power'Lawmaker Raymond Kwong said he didn't remember exactly what he had thrown at Leung.
"I
threw a lot of stuff over there, I don't know exactly what," Kwong told
reporters after the incident. But he berated journalists for an
attitude which would see them "become slaves in future."
"When dealing with this sort of absolute power, one can't be too polite," he said. "So what if I did throw [the glass]?"
Many
who marched on Tuesday called for Leung's resignation, saying he is out
of step with public opinion, after 800,000 voted last month in an
unofficial referendum for some form of public nomination in the 2017
elections.
Police, who detained more than 500 protesters during a
peaceful sit-in that followed the march, said they were investigating
the incident.
Currently, half of the seats in Hong Kong's
Legislative Council are filled through direct election from
geographical constituencies, with the rest chosen by professional
groups, businesspeople, and corporations.
A growing riftThe
pelting of Leung comes amid a growing rift between Hong Kong officials
and lawmakers in the wake of a controversial funding bill last month for
two new towns in the northeast of the territory, which many say was
forced through by Leung's administration in the face of considerable
public objection.
China's tightly controlled state media, which
has condemned both the referendum and the march, hit out with an ominous
warning on Thursday.
The English-language tabloid
Global Times,
which has close ties to the ruling Chinese Communist Party, said Hong
Kong could become the next Ukraine or Thailand if goes ahead with
"political upheaval."
In a veiled reference to plans for a civil
disobedience movement occupying Hong Kong's Central business district,
the paper said Wednesday's sit-in had undermined the rule of law in Hong
Kong, which has traditionally enjoyed freedom of the press and of
association.
"Without the rule of law, Hong Kong could sink into
the likes of Ukraine or Thailand and all kinds of dangerous phenomena
could happen," the paper said in an editorial.
"The radical opposition organizers had admitted that their action would be unlawful. But they still went ahead," it said.
"After
[their arrest], some of the troublemakers even unreasonably pointed
their fingers at the police for 'using force,'" it continued, without
offering further details.
Peaceful protestHong
Kong's police force action against the 2,000 protesters who blocked
Chater Road in the city's downtown area overnight was roundly criticized
by Amnesty International, which said the freedom to stage protests is
enshrined in international law, and that force should only be used as a
last resort.
Those protesters, most of whom were students, who
hadn't yet been moved got up and walked away at a prearranged time of
8.00 a.m.
Police also came under fire for requesting that
journalists leave the scene before they began moving protesters, a move
which has added to concerns about press freedom following a string of
physical attacks on the liberal media.
Hong Kong lawmaker and
Civic Party leader Alan Leong said on Thursday that the student-led
sit-in had been conducted in the tradition of nonviolent civil
disobedience.
"They were very peaceful, and anyone continuing to
try to smear the Occupy Central campaign has no basis in reality," Leong
told RFA on Thursday.
"Everyone could see that Occupy Central is likely to be very peaceful because of the way the students behaved."
Meanwhile,
lecturers and professors at 41 further and higher education
institutions launched a campaign of support for the students being
charged with public-order offenses after the sit-in.
"Not only
was there no provocation, there was no bad language," they wrote in a
post on Facebook. "They just sat there peacefully, arms linked, as the
police cleared the area, entirely in the spirit of nonviolent protest."
Need for debateWhile
Beijing has said Hong Kong can elect its own leader in the 2017 race
for chief executive, it has stopped short of allowing candidates to run
who have not been previously approved by Beijing.
A poll conducted by the English-language
South China Morning Post newspaper found that 91 percent of marchers questioned had joined the march in support of public nominations.
Another
major reason given was opposition to a June 10 white paper in which
Beijing asserted its rule over Hong Kong, saying the city's
traditionally independent judges are "administrators" who should be
"patriotic."
A top U.S. diplomat on Wednesday called on China to
give Hong Kong the space to debate its political future and allow the
"vigorous" voices of the city's residents to be heard.
"We want
to see continued evidence that the rights of the people of Hong Kong are
being respected and that the principles that China embraced in
connection with reversion are honored," America's top diplomat for East
Asia, Assistant Secretary of State Daniel Russel, told Agence
France-Presse.
China's foreign ministry responded by telling Washington to stay out of its internal affairs.
"The
Chinese government resolutely opposes any interventions by any other
countries and expects the relevant country to stop making irresponsible
comments on Hong Kong's internal affairs," Foreign Ministry spokesman
Hong Lei told reporters.
Hong Kong was promised "a high degree of autonomy" under the terms of its 1997 handover from Britain to China.